Organizations Should Monitor Online Comments from Victims during Crises, MU Researchers Say
By Nathan Hurst
MU News Bureau
Columbia, Mo. (June 24, 2011) — With the increasing pervasiveness of social media and online communication in the operation of most organizations and corporations, little is known about the potential effects of public expressions of anger displayed throughout various online sources. Now, researchers at the University of Missouri have found that angry user-generated comments on Internet sites can further perpetuate negative perceptions of an organization undergoing the crisis.
Bokyung Kim found that angry user-generated comments on Internet sites can further perpetuate negative perceptions of an organization undergoing the crisis.
Based on her findings, Bokyung Kim, a doctoral student in the Missouri School of Journalism, urges public relations practitioners to consider angry user-generated messages as critical crisis information that has a direct impact on the public in general. She says evaluation is particularly crucial because of how much the public relies on unsubstantiated Web-based information.
“During crises, organizations need to make an effort to respond to negative online comments from users,” Kim said. “They can contact the user directly, post a response on the site for all to see, or in extreme cases, remove the comments from the site. In any fashion, organizations need to monitor their online presence closely to prevent the negative perceptions from spiraling out of control.”
For the experimental study, Kim measured participants’ baseline perceptions of four automobile corporations. The participants were then read a news story about a crisis each automobile corporation was undergoing and were asked the same questions about their perceptions of each corporation. The participants were then shown negative online comments from Facebook, Twitter and other online message boards that were in response to each crisis situation. The participants were given comments both from victims of each crisis, as well as comments from the unaffected public. Finally, the participants were again asked to respond the same questions regarding their perceptions of each corporation. While there were no differences in participants’ reaction depending on the platform of the online comments (e.g. Facebook, Twitter, etc.), Kim found that while both victim-generated and unaffected public-generated online comments affected participants’ perceptions negatively, victim-generated comments had the greatest effect.
“Victims have higher credible perceptions for readers so I would definitely suggest that organizations should pay closer attention to content created by perceived victims of the crisis than content created by an anonymous source,” Kim said. “We found that negative messages created by victims significantly increased the negative reputation of an organization and were more likely to result in boycotts against the organization than when it was sourced to unaffected individuals.”
This study was presented at the International Communication Association Conference in May, and was co-authored by Hyunmin Lee, an assistant professor at St. Louis University and former doctoral candidate at MU.
Updated: August 15, 2019